"If I charge you $500 to fix your toilet, what part of that is profit or capital gain? The answer: You cannot decipher. Therefore, you cannot tax something that is considered an equal exchange on labor. You fix my toilet, I give you $500. It is quite simple." ROCK ON
read more | digg story
Tales of the Bone Machine - A fair and balanced look at Hollywood, Politics, Media and Cute, Furry Animals, plus updates on those Vicious Squirrels and their Planned Squirrel Invasion and Uprising - by Keith Coogan
Friday, July 27, 2007
Tuesday, July 24, 2007
Sunday, July 22, 2007
Thursday, July 19, 2007
Tuesday, July 17, 2007
Monday, July 16, 2007
Sunday, July 15, 2007
Saturday, July 14, 2007
Friday, July 13, 2007
Bic lighter
Bic lighter
Originally uploaded by hollywoodkids
An example of a well designed product.
Just like the iPhone.7
Lick my iPhone
Lick my iPhone
Originally uploaded by hollywoodkids
The iPhone is so great, you'll just want to lick it.
Wednesday, July 11, 2007
Breaking!!: Cheney on the DC Madam List.
As of yet, I have not seen one mention of this in the mainstream media.I wonder why?Can we impeach him now?
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Saturday, July 07, 2007
Friday, July 06, 2007
So let me get this straight....
I want to be sure I understand this.
A man was convicted of lying in court about outing a CIA officer.
But she was married to a man who didn't think Iraq was a threat.
So.....
The man that broke the law gets his sentence commuted by the very President that he was working for when he broke the law.
Was the President trying to get the man that was married to the CIA officer to shut up?
Why did they do it?
Does anybody else even know what I'm talking about or even care about the implications of the whole story?
Why are we at war with Iraq?
The legal reason seems to be something about WMD's.
The same ones that the guy that was married to the CIA officer said were probably not there.
So someone discloses her identity to get him to shut up or be discredited.
We go to war as a country against Iraq because everyone is so sure that there were WMD's.
There were no WMD's.
We executed the man that was holding at least some semblance of peace and order of the region in his dictator grip.
So we find out that the man that outed the CIA officer, who was the wife of the guy that didn't think there were WMD's is busted, and then found guilty of lying and sentenced to jail and fined.
Our President then commutes his sentence so he doesn't have to do the jail time.
But didn't the lie that he told help the President get the political clout he needed to attack Iraq?
Is this an infinite loop of illogic.... or am I missing something?
A man was convicted of lying in court about outing a CIA officer.
But she was married to a man who didn't think Iraq was a threat.
So.....
The man that broke the law gets his sentence commuted by the very President that he was working for when he broke the law.
Was the President trying to get the man that was married to the CIA officer to shut up?
Why did they do it?
Does anybody else even know what I'm talking about or even care about the implications of the whole story?
Why are we at war with Iraq?
The legal reason seems to be something about WMD's.
The same ones that the guy that was married to the CIA officer said were probably not there.
So someone discloses her identity to get him to shut up or be discredited.
We go to war as a country against Iraq because everyone is so sure that there were WMD's.
There were no WMD's.
We executed the man that was holding at least some semblance of peace and order of the region in his dictator grip.
So we find out that the man that outed the CIA officer, who was the wife of the guy that didn't think there were WMD's is busted, and then found guilty of lying and sentenced to jail and fined.
Our President then commutes his sentence so he doesn't have to do the jail time.
But didn't the lie that he told help the President get the political clout he needed to attack Iraq?
Is this an infinite loop of illogic.... or am I missing something?
Thursday, June 14, 2007
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
US Army Pushes For Amnesty Bill Fast Track So It Can Recruit Illegal Aliens
A senior US defense official today urged the Congress to fast track a section of the stalled immigration bill that would allow the military to recruit illegal aliens, after recruitment figures released by Pentagon showed that the Army failed to reach its targets for May.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Friday, June 08, 2007
Paris could have done up to six months under California Law
Driving on a Suspended License Facts
The DMV can suspend or revoke your driver's license for many reasons, including driving under the influence, drug possession, not carrying auto liability insurance, not filing an SR1 traffic collision report after an accident, medical conditions, failure to pay child support, and other reasons.
Driving on a suspended or revoked driver's license is a misdemeanor criminal charge, and you can be arrested and taken into custody. The punishments for driving on a suspended license can include a fine of up to $1000 and up to six months in jail. If you have previous criminal traffic convictions, the fine and jail time can both be increased. You may be required to install an ignition interlock device on your car, and in some cases, the State of California may take away your car.
The DMV can suspend or revoke your driver's license for many reasons, including driving under the influence, drug possession, not carrying auto liability insurance, not filing an SR1 traffic collision report after an accident, medical conditions, failure to pay child support, and other reasons.
Driving on a suspended or revoked driver's license is a misdemeanor criminal charge, and you can be arrested and taken into custody. The punishments for driving on a suspended license can include a fine of up to $1000 and up to six months in jail. If you have previous criminal traffic convictions, the fine and jail time can both be increased. You may be required to install an ignition interlock device on your car, and in some cases, the State of California may take away your car.
Thursday, June 07, 2007
Justice system proves to be unfair!
Please contact the following person to find out why rich people get treated better than poor people.
Los Angeles County Sheriff
Leroy (Lee) D. Baca
4700 Ramona Blvd
Monterey Park, CA 91754
Phone: (213) 526-5000
Email: webemail@lasd.org
Web Page: www.lasd.org
Paris Hilton was sentenced to jail. The judge clearly said that she was not to be released early, or go under house arrest with an ankle bracelet.
Sheriff Baca directly violated this judges wishes, and should therefore be recalled.
Recall Sheriff Lee Baca.
Please.
We need to send the right message to our youth, they are corrupt enough as it is, we don't need to make things worse.
What kind of an example does this set when a person who violates their parole gets 3 days in a private cell? She repeatedly broke the law, ignored her punishment, and now, apparently, doesn't have to finish serving her time.
Completely unfair. I would be pissed off right now if I had the same charges, yet were serving even 1 hour longer in jail than Paris has.
Los Angeles County Sheriff
Leroy (Lee) D. Baca
4700 Ramona Blvd
Monterey Park, CA 91754
Phone: (213) 526-5000
Email: webemail@lasd.org
Web Page: www.lasd.org
Paris Hilton was sentenced to jail. The judge clearly said that she was not to be released early, or go under house arrest with an ankle bracelet.
Sheriff Baca directly violated this judges wishes, and should therefore be recalled.
Recall Sheriff Lee Baca.
Please.
We need to send the right message to our youth, they are corrupt enough as it is, we don't need to make things worse.
What kind of an example does this set when a person who violates their parole gets 3 days in a private cell? She repeatedly broke the law, ignored her punishment, and now, apparently, doesn't have to finish serving her time.
Completely unfair. I would be pissed off right now if I had the same charges, yet were serving even 1 hour longer in jail than Paris has.
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Take the time to remember D-Day
I noticed there was absolutely NO mention of D-Day on this morning's "news" programs.
How sad.
We have an entire generation now that has no memory or knowledge of the sacrifices that previous generations have made on their behalf.
We used to try to provide for a better future for our children.
Now the only thing we provide is fear, and hopelessness.
We truly will be worse off as a country when the last of the "Great Generation" kicks the bucket.
What we really need now is a draft.
Make the kids of today go off to fight a war in a foreign land, that ought to straighten 'em out!
How sad.
We have an entire generation now that has no memory or knowledge of the sacrifices that previous generations have made on their behalf.
We used to try to provide for a better future for our children.
Now the only thing we provide is fear, and hopelessness.
We truly will be worse off as a country when the last of the "Great Generation" kicks the bucket.
What we really need now is a draft.
Make the kids of today go off to fight a war in a foreign land, that ought to straighten 'em out!
Monday, June 04, 2007
Former Top Rove Aide Resigns after Revelation of Illegal Voter 'Caging'
Big media is ignoring the story that former White House Deputy Communications Director Tim Griffin resigned as the U.S. Attorney in Arkansas last week after evidence revealed he was directly involved in voter suppression in the 2004 elections.... I knew the voters in this country didn't want Bush to take office! Now we are beginning to see what really happened. I bet we NEVER voted for him. Let's take another good, hard look at the 2000 & 2004 elections, and the claims of voter suppression, fraud and voter intimidation that came with them. Can you say "Hanging Chad"? I knew that you could.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Saturday, June 02, 2007
2007 Bilderberg Meeting In Istanbul [VIDEO]
The 2007 Bilderberg Meeting is going to be at Istanbul, Turkey. This is a Clip from Dutch TV.The Portugal News has been informed by Turkish journalist Cengiz Candar that this years annual Bilderberg meeting is scheduled to take place in Istanbul from May 31st to June 3rd.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Bush hires Halliburton/KBR to build detention camps in USA
Bush has inked a deal with Halliburton/KBR to build "detention camps" in the United States. Last year in 2006 KBR was award $3685 million to build detention camps in the United States that could be used to house American citizens during emergencies. Bush has also put out a directive that gives him dictatorial powers in an emergency.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Tuesday, May 29, 2007
A website with the cutest pictures and videos on the web, period.
No really, this site has a huge collection of super cute pictures. Little fuzzy, adorable, cuddly creatures. You know how much I love pictures of cute animals. Go here, and see how cute they can be!
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Thursday, May 24, 2007
I have to share a cool thing with you all.
Please check out the site that has been sending TONS of traffic over to my little old homepage.
Former Child Star Central
Here is a brief sample of what's on their homepage right now:
Dustin Diamond (Saved by the Bell) | File Under: "Extremely Offensive"
Maureen McCormick (The Brady Club) | File Under: Shaping Up
Shia LaBeouf (Even Stevens) | File Under: Indiana-Bound
Danny Bonaduce (The Partridge Family) | File Under: Divorce Court, His
Marie Osmond (Donny & Marie) | File Under: Divorce Court, Hers
Keith Coogan (Adventures in Babysitting) | File Under: All-New Wil Wheaton?
Brian Bonsall (Family Ties) | File Under: Busted
Britney Spears (Teen Idol) | File Under: Out of Rehab
Keri Russell (MMC) | File Under: Married, and Expecting
Ray J (The Sinbad Show) | File Under: Sex-Tape Star
I thought this was absolutely awesome! Please visit their website, it is very entertaining to say the least.
Please check out the site that has been sending TONS of traffic over to my little old homepage.
Former Child Star Central
Here is a brief sample of what's on their homepage right now:
Dustin Diamond (Saved by the Bell) | File Under: "Extremely Offensive"
Maureen McCormick (The Brady Club) | File Under: Shaping Up
Shia LaBeouf (Even Stevens) | File Under: Indiana-Bound
Danny Bonaduce (The Partridge Family) | File Under: Divorce Court, His
Marie Osmond (Donny & Marie) | File Under: Divorce Court, Hers
Keith Coogan (Adventures in Babysitting) | File Under: All-New Wil Wheaton?
Brian Bonsall (Family Ties) | File Under: Busted
Britney Spears (Teen Idol) | File Under: Out of Rehab
Keri Russell (MMC) | File Under: Married, and Expecting
Ray J (The Sinbad Show) | File Under: Sex-Tape Star
I thought this was absolutely awesome! Please visit their website, it is very entertaining to say the least.
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
The CIA has received secret presidential approval to mount a covert "black" operation to destabilize the Iranian government, current and former officials in the intelligence community tell the Blotter on ABCNews.com.
Um.... I really don't know what to say about this.
Not only is it not that "black" (how on earth would we possibly hear about it if it was supposed to be such a "secret"?), but doesn't this strike you as one of the dumbest ideas ever? WWIII anyone?
read more | digg story
Um.... I really don't know what to say about this.
Not only is it not that "black" (how on earth would we possibly hear about it if it was supposed to be such a "secret"?), but doesn't this strike you as one of the dumbest ideas ever? WWIII anyone?
read more | digg story
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
Top 25 Censored Stories
Here is a list of the top 25 censored stories of 2007. Pay close attention to the second story about Haliburton selling Nuclear Technology to Iran... in 2005!!!! Doesn't that mean that Haliburton is aiding and providing comfort to the enemy? Shoot, they are selling nuclear technology to the very country they want to invade because they have nuclear technology.My brain just melted.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Monday, May 14, 2007
Congratulations! You May Already Be A Terrorist!
Do you believe that government policies are immoral and infringe on individual liberty? That gun control violates your rights? That the government is violating the principles of the Constitution? That the government violates the principles of your religion? If so, the government already considers you a terrorist and wants you under surveillance.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Thursday, May 10, 2007
Homeland Security Office Existed Prior To 9/11
This video is taken from a report on Fox News that was made within hours of the 9/11 attacks. The person reporting is current White House Press Secretary Tony Snow, who was Fox news personality on 9/11/01. The report states, ironically enough, that two offices that were in the Pentagon section that was hit were related to terrorism.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Tuesday, May 08, 2007
Horrible heat. Yahoo News! has said, "Several daily heat records were broken Monday. Among them, Los Angeles International Airport recorded a high of 88, beating the 80-degree record set in 1984."
Griffith Park is on fire. I was outside shooting some video of flames licking at the heels of the Griffith Park Observatory. Very cool looking, although horrible to witness. It looked all orange and angry.
It is still hot as a Dickens. This Summer is going to be hell.
Griffith Park is on fire. I was outside shooting some video of flames licking at the heels of the Griffith Park Observatory. Very cool looking, although horrible to witness. It looked all orange and angry.
It is still hot as a Dickens. This Summer is going to be hell.
In the military, when you fly the American Flag upside down, or when you fly another flag above the American Flag, this is a signal that the area is compromised, in trouble, or has fallen to the "enemy". If these students do not show respect for our Flag and our customs and laws, then why should we bend over backwards to continue to provide amnesty, support, education and health coverage for anyone who does not support our country or way of life? Saint Patrick's Day is proof that just because I'm Irish, this country doesn't want to strip me of my National Identity. However, I believe Saint Patrick's Day was set down as a holiday only after the Irish were accepted into American Society. We already celebrate Cinco De Mayo, now, can we have some quid pro quo?

Quoted from article:
"I predict this stunt will be the nail in the coffin of any guest-worker/amnesty plan on the table in Washington. The image of the American flag subsumed to another and turned upside down on American soil is already spreading on Internet forums and via e-mail. Pass this along to every American citizen in your address books and to every representative in the state and federal government. If you choose to remain uninvolved do not be amazed when you no longer have a nation to call your own nor anything you have worked for left since it will be "redistributed" to the activists while you are so peacefully staying out of the "fray". Check history, it is full of nations/empires that disappeared when its citizens no longer held their core beliefs and values. One person CAN make a difference. One plus one plus one plus one plus one plus one........."
Quoted from article:
"I predict this stunt will be the nail in the coffin of any guest-worker/amnesty plan on the table in Washington. The image of the American flag subsumed to another and turned upside down on American soil is already spreading on Internet forums and via e-mail. Pass this along to every American citizen in your address books and to every representative in the state and federal government. If you choose to remain uninvolved do not be amazed when you no longer have a nation to call your own nor anything you have worked for left since it will be "redistributed" to the activists while you are so peacefully staying out of the "fray". Check history, it is full of nations/empires that disappeared when its citizens no longer held their core beliefs and values. One person CAN make a difference. One plus one plus one plus one plus one plus one........."
Monday, May 07, 2007
Corporate Media Censor Ron Paul's Debate Success
Goes to show you that we don't really elect our president, one is appointed for us.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Thursday, May 03, 2007
Why is Cheney impeachment not in the news?!
OpEd piece asking a very good question. Even for those that don't think impeachment is appropriate, isn't it still news when entire Cities and States start drafting legislation towards and very close votes actually support such a path? Now, I'm not saying that our "intelligence mistake" sure looks a whole heck of a lot like an occupation with an intent to create permanent bases in Iraq to protect the Oil that is being pumped out of the ground, but some could see it that way. So why the press blackout? Is the administration afraid of what would happen? Do they have any control over the press? And if so, are they using their influence?
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Wednesday, May 02, 2007
LOST prepares for season finale with an amazing episode tonight (3x19)
The search for redemption follows many paths. For the lost souls on Lost, efforts at salvation vary from small acts of kindness that promote forgiveness to sudden acts of violence that promise freedom. For the show itself, redemption consists of a string of solid, and sometimes superb, episodes that has firmly re-established Lost in TV's top ranks,
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
HD DVD cracks: there's no going back
Last night, the AACS LA's attempts to keep an HD DVD crack under wraps backfired in a spectacular fashion. Pandora's Box is now wide open and there's no going back now.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Tuesday, May 01, 2007
04 09 F9 11 02 9D seven four E3 5B D8 41 five six C5 63 five six crazy __'s C0 LO RA DO
Gee, I guess if you removed the 04 at the beginning, and then got rid of the part of Colorado that is not part of the official postal abbreviation for the state, replaced the written out words with numbers, and you get the reference to Kill Bill, then you would have a number in hexadecimal format that some people don't want you to read, know about or use. I certainly do not condone or support the use of such a number.
I'm not sure what the number is... or how to use it...
But it seems to be pissing off a lot of people.
Now, where else on the net would I find such a number?
Gee, I guess if you removed the 04 at the beginning, and then got rid of the part of Colorado that is not part of the official postal abbreviation for the state, replaced the written out words with numbers, and you get the reference to Kill Bill, then you would have a number in hexadecimal format that some people don't want you to read, know about or use. I certainly do not condone or support the use of such a number.
I'm not sure what the number is... or how to use it...
But it seems to be pissing off a lot of people.
Now, where else on the net would I find such a number?
Thursday, April 26, 2007
OK, so cute cats playing piano is so awesome, I wanted to show you the follow-up video! I really think this cat is trying to tell us something. It could be a reincarnated soul singer from the sixties. Maybe it's Scott Joplin, trying to write a new ragtime classic? Whatever it is, or whoever this cat is... she jams, man!
Tuesday, April 24, 2007
Wednesday, April 11, 2007
Thursday, March 29, 2007
The creators of "Lost" have listened to their fan base. They killed off the two most annoying characters ever introduced to a running series.
Now, all apologies to the actors that played Nikki and Paulo, it was through no fault of your own that your parts were added just to annoy us "Lost" fans. Heck, I have even worked with Kylie Sanchez, Sam Anderson, and Andrew Divoff. Andrew is the nicest "Bad Guy" in the industry. Sam is a classic, and Kylie is very sweet. If I was given any role in "Lost", I would immediately take it, sight unseen, so I cannot blame any of these actors or their work for their demise on the show. (Patchy and apparently Nikki and Paulo are dead, and Rose and Bernard have been downsized) But I have to say, that when Sawyer was all, "Who the hell is Nikki?" and when a killer spider was introduced to off them... I was grinning in my cold, sick, and rotten soul. My heart kept saying, "Yes! Kill them... kill them all, now!"
All great actors. And apart from Nikki and Paul, all great roles. I do wish the best for Kylie and Rodrigo, however... it was time they went away.
Take care all, and see you next week for the next episode of "Lost"!
Now, all apologies to the actors that played Nikki and Paulo, it was through no fault of your own that your parts were added just to annoy us "Lost" fans. Heck, I have even worked with Kylie Sanchez, Sam Anderson, and Andrew Divoff. Andrew is the nicest "Bad Guy" in the industry. Sam is a classic, and Kylie is very sweet. If I was given any role in "Lost", I would immediately take it, sight unseen, so I cannot blame any of these actors or their work for their demise on the show. (Patchy and apparently Nikki and Paulo are dead, and Rose and Bernard have been downsized) But I have to say, that when Sawyer was all, "Who the hell is Nikki?" and when a killer spider was introduced to off them... I was grinning in my cold, sick, and rotten soul. My heart kept saying, "Yes! Kill them... kill them all, now!"
All great actors. And apart from Nikki and Paul, all great roles. I do wish the best for Kylie and Rodrigo, however... it was time they went away.
Take care all, and see you next week for the next episode of "Lost"!
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
You could have one hell of a weekend with what's in this fridge.

The final contents of Anna Nicole's fridge are quite telling. Shoot... I knew that slim-fast stuff was bad for you, but this is just plain awful. Listen up kids... don't try to control your weight, it's really very dangerous. Oh, and a methadone addiction has its problems as well.
The final contents of Anna Nicole's fridge are quite telling. Shoot... I knew that slim-fast stuff was bad for you, but this is just plain awful. Listen up kids... don't try to control your weight, it's really very dangerous. Oh, and a methadone addiction has its problems as well.
Friday, January 05, 2007
Australian Squirrel Monkey
In keeping with the theme of this blog (either political news and commentary or photos of cute animals), here is the first cute and furry animal of the year.
This is an Australian Squirrel Monkey, apparently clinging to some kind of a stuffed animal of a goose-like nature.
Enjoy... and Happy New Year!
Friday, December 15, 2006
So, I just had to link to two posts that absolutely catch lightning in a bottle.
First up, my friend Wil has commented on the insanity that has overtaken this country as a whole, and more specifically, the absolutely stupid way in which our airlines and the TSA have reacted to the ongoing "Terrorist Threats".
Wil Wheaton's astute observations regarding the way TSA has been treating people.
Subsequently, I think everyone needs to ask Nurse Ratchett to up their meds. The total lack of caring regarding truth, justice and the American way has been addressed best in the following article.
Flying over the Cuckoo's Nest.
There, I did it. Now send me to one of those new camps, I want to play some volleyball with other "Fifth Columnists".
By the way, to the government official who can't read into my sarcasm, I'm just expressing my opinions and views. So, don't go picking me up in the middle of the night and "disappearing" me.
Thanks.
First up, my friend Wil has commented on the insanity that has overtaken this country as a whole, and more specifically, the absolutely stupid way in which our airlines and the TSA have reacted to the ongoing "Terrorist Threats".
Wil Wheaton's astute observations regarding the way TSA has been treating people.
Subsequently, I think everyone needs to ask Nurse Ratchett to up their meds. The total lack of caring regarding truth, justice and the American way has been addressed best in the following article.
Flying over the Cuckoo's Nest.
There, I did it. Now send me to one of those new camps, I want to play some volleyball with other "Fifth Columnists".
By the way, to the government official who can't read into my sarcasm, I'm just expressing my opinions and views. So, don't go picking me up in the middle of the night and "disappearing" me.
Thanks.
Saturday, November 25, 2006
Are we to believe that these are the WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION that were the reason for invading Iraq?
Thursday, November 23, 2006
Feminism Can Be Cured - If Diagnosed Early
This kind of matches my basic philosophy for relationships... you be you, and I'll be me.
This kind of matches my basic philosophy for relationships... you be you, and I'll be me.
Wednesday, October 04, 2006
Tuesday, October 03, 2006
H5N1 Virus Discovered in California Duck
This wasn't the "October Surprise" I was hoping for. Does anyone remember the new emergency powers granted to Bush? It gives him the right to suspend elections if the bird flu made its way onto our shores. California has many colleges, but one of the biggest ones is it's "Electoral" College. What would happen if California wasn't allowed to vote in the next election?
More of the same. For many years to come. Actually, since the end of the world is slated for December 21st, 2012. Then whoever wins the election in 2008, will certainly be holding the reigns when the shit hits the fan. Once again, the Republicans have set the Democrats up with an impossible situation to overcome. Even Hillary Clinton couldn't turn this boat around. But we'll probably have great healthcare when the end of the world comes!
This wasn't the "October Surprise" I was hoping for. Does anyone remember the new emergency powers granted to Bush? It gives him the right to suspend elections if the bird flu made its way onto our shores. California has many colleges, but one of the biggest ones is it's "Electoral" College. What would happen if California wasn't allowed to vote in the next election?
More of the same. For many years to come. Actually, since the end of the world is slated for December 21st, 2012. Then whoever wins the election in 2008, will certainly be holding the reigns when the shit hits the fan. Once again, the Republicans have set the Democrats up with an impossible situation to overcome. Even Hillary Clinton couldn't turn this boat around. But we'll probably have great healthcare when the end of the world comes!
Thursday, September 28, 2006
Squirrels Attack!
I love headlines that include the words "squirrel" and "attack".
Especially in that order.
Especially in that order.
Squirrels Attack Humans in California!
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Suspected illegal workers arrested at military housing site
The exploitation of an inexpensive labor force has come home to roost. You can now see how pervasive the problem is. Your house was built by "undocumented" individuals working under the banner of a cheap contractor. Have you seen what happens in other countries when an earthquake hits? Because of poor construction techniques and practices, one usually sees complete neighborhoods levelled, resulting in the need for "The Flea" to dig victims out of the rubble.
The exploitation of an inexpensive labor force has come home to roost. You can now see how pervasive the problem is. Your house was built by "undocumented" individuals working under the banner of a cheap contractor. Have you seen what happens in other countries when an earthquake hits? Because of poor construction techniques and practices, one usually sees complete neighborhoods levelled, resulting in the need for "The Flea" to dig victims out of the rubble.
Wednesday, September 20, 2006
Just now on CNN, Air Force Col. Sam Gardiner (Ret.) said, “We are conducting military operations inside Iran right now. The evidence is overwhelming.”
Here is a link to the article and video.
ThinkProgress.org
Here is a link to the article and video.
ThinkProgress.org
Friday, September 15, 2006
Friday, September 08, 2006
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Whistleblowers found dead.
Of course, nothing like this could happen. Not in this country. We have generations that have fought and died for the God-given rights found in our constitution. Apparently, things change.
Of course, nothing like this could happen. Not in this country. We have generations that have fought and died for the God-given rights found in our constitution. Apparently, things change.
Saturday, August 19, 2006
"OK, I Love You" is a brief fable showing how something could seem scary at first, but may turn out to be cute and cuddly. Shot on the streets of Los Angeles, where believe it or not, no one paid any attention to us while we were filming this. The only one who actually stopped what they were doing to watch us shoot, was a homeless guy, who incidentally has a cameo appearance.
Monday, August 14, 2006
Wednesday, August 09, 2006
New World Order has taken one step closer to our shores. Watch for the detention camps, the forming of any North American Union, and the widening of hostilities in the middle east. I bet you come election time, there will be an "incident" that creates an atmosphere of "martial law" and that voting priviledges will be "temporarily" suspended. Have a nice year!
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Detention Camps may be the next big thing. Work off those extra pounds, meet fellow citizens, and finally find a place where you can escape television news! I want someplace with nice weather, and lots of water activities. I love to waterski. Camp sounds like a lot of fun.
Friday, July 28, 2006
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Update for the sake of an update.
Hey there, not much is news in real life. The world seems to have gone to hell in a hand basket. We have wars on several fronts, natural disasters, global warming and now Paris Hilton's music career. I really feel overwhelmed. Please, someone stop the madness before it's too late!
Hey there, not much is news in real life. The world seems to have gone to hell in a hand basket. We have wars on several fronts, natural disasters, global warming and now Paris Hilton's music career. I really feel overwhelmed. Please, someone stop the madness before it's too late!
Friday, June 16, 2006
Corners - Episode 1 - Hollywood & Highland
As seen through the eyes of former child star Keith Coogan.
Get this video and more at MySpace.com
As seen through the eyes of former child star Keith Coogan.
Get this video and more at MySpace.com
Monday, June 05, 2006
They may know more than they're letting on. Hey kids! Feel like heading out of town for no reason on or around the 19th of June? After reading this article about our bunker government, this might not be such a bad idea. It's gonna be a hot Summer!
Friday, June 02, 2006
I haven't seen it yet, but apparently, "An Inconvenient Truth" is supposed to create some sort of paradigm shift in our consumercentric thinking. Hey, I'm all down for saving the planet, but is there anything we can do about Paris Hilton? (WARNING, LINK FOR PARIS REVEALS HER TRUE SKANKY SELF, SO... I WARNED YOU!) I mean really, who cares about that trustafarian anyways. I'm quite done hearing about her, her skanky rich boyfriends, and their criticism of Lindsay Lohan. I mean shit, didn't Lindsay earn every red cent she has, completely on her own? So to Paris, and whatever boy toy she decides to drag though the press this week, go choke on your whistle.
Tuesday, May 30, 2006
Keith Coogan's Myspace page
I really hated "Friendster", but this Myspace thing might just "catch on", as they say.
Has anyone else heard about this site yet? (Insert thick sarcastic tone here)
I really hated "Friendster", but this Myspace thing might just "catch on", as they say.
Has anyone else heard about this site yet? (Insert thick sarcastic tone here)
Thursday, May 25, 2006
Lost is over until the Fall season starts. Having major withdrawals. Join us at the message board at the link above to talk about "The Greatest Television Series Ever Created!"
Monday, May 15, 2006
The President of the United States is bending over backwards to give more rights to people who enter the country illegally, yet tax-paying citizens were ignored for days when the levees broke in New Orleans. Something doesn't seem right with this. Where are my tax dollars going? Why does the President ignore the needs of a whole city, yet help criminals cross our borders and find work, housing, education and health care? Where was all of this help for the poor victims of hurricane Katrina? Something is rotten in Denmark. This should be a wake-up call for anyone who wants to come here and enjoy what this county has to offer. If you look closely, it's not all that great of a place to come to.
Saturday, April 22, 2006
I will not buy any more gasoline.
$3.09 is too much to pay for gas. $400,000,000.00 is too much to give to an oil executive. There is something wrong with this picture, yet no one is doing or saying anything about it.
So I will.
I will not buy any more gasoline.
Saturday, April 08, 2006
Libby Sings
John Prados
April 07, 2006
John Prados is a senior fellow of the National Security Archive in Washington, D.C., and author of Hoodwinked: The Documents that Reveal How Bush Sold Us a War (The New Press).
The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Just a few months ago defenders of the Bush administration were lambasting Justice Department prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald for engaging in a fishing expedition that might hurt President George W. Bush. The pundits considered Fitzgerald’s indictment for perjury of former vice-presidential aide I. Lewis (“Scooter”) Libby to be politically motivated and wrong.
To recap, Libby’s alleged perjury occurred during his testimony to a grand jury investigating the blown cover of CIA clandestine officer Valerie Plame Wilson, bound up in a White House bid to neutralize criticism of the Iraq war. The Plame affair started as an effort to discredit Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whom the CIA had sent to Niger to look into charges that Iraq was buying uranium ore there. Wilson found nothing to substantiate the claim and subsequently became a critic of Bush’s resort to war. His wife was outed in an attempt to undermine Wilson’s charges.
Continued legal filings in the case now reveal Prosecutor Fitzgerald as a guardian of White House secrets and Scooter Libby plus his defense team as assiduously implicating President Bush. For those who questioned George Bush’s modus operandi in the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq and afterwards these are perhaps not unexpected developments. But the gradual emergence of the contents of the Libby grand jury testimony is important not only because it contradicts the president’s public denials of the leaks, but also for potentially placing the president at the center of a smear campaign.
Prosecutor Fitzgerald’s April 5 response to the Libby team’s latest motion to compel discovery of a vast array of documents discloses that Vice President Dick Cheney told Libby that President Bush had “specifically” authorized officials in the summer of 2003 to reveal certain contents of the secret U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on alleged Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. There will be an argument over whether Bush or Cheney actually had that authority (which is vested in the Director of Central Intelligence by a law on the books since 1949) but that is not the concern here. Rather, the disclosure of this deliberate Bush leak—given to Judith Miller of The New York Times and others—provides new evidence that the White House regarded the top secret NIE not as an intelligence appreciation but as fodder for political warfare. In fact on July 12 Cheney ordered Libby to speak to the press about the NIE.
The new evidence also says something about Bush secrecy. This administration has moved on many levels to restrict public—and even official—access to information. Cutting off flows of data formerly routinely provided to Congress or the public, defenestrating access to the records of former presidents mandated by the Presidential Records Act, curbing the Freedom of Information Act, refusing to describe to Congress its domestic communications interception program and most recently reclassifying documents in the public domain for years. Suddenly we see President Bush, without a care, releasing secret records he felt would bolster his case.
Moreover, the way in which this was done should send shudders down the spine: according to the Fitzgerald filing, Scooter Libby told the grand jury that “he understood that even in the days following his conversation with Ms. Miller, other key officials—including Cabinet level officials—were not made aware of the earlier declassification even as those officials were pressed to carry out a declassification of the NIE, the report about Wilson’s trip and another classified document dated January 24, 2003,” evidently a reference to the materials assembled by CIA officer Robert Walpole regarding Iraq’s weapons programs and used for Secretary of State Colin L. Powell’s speech to the United Nations Security Council a couple of weeks later. If Libby’s testimony is accurate, documents were to be simultaneously deemed secret and declassified, depending upon White House whim, convenience, or legal liability.
This is the same administration that is seeking to prosecute those who leaked information considered less favorable to its cause, such as the fact of the National Security Agency’s dubious domestic spying program or the existence of the CIA’s secret prison network. Under the interpretation of the Espionage Act the Bush Justice Department is using to prosecute two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, even reporters who gain access to such information, media that inform the public of it, or persons who merely possess the information are currently at risk, although the statute appears to criminalize only the act of leaking. Indeed, the law makes it necessary for the NIE data not to be classified in order for Libby to legally leak it. There may be an argument here that under the Bush interpretation of the statute the act of declassification to abet a leak could amount to a criminal conspiracy, in this case by President George Bush himself.
Those who contend that there was no Bush effort to make political use of intelligence in the months leading up to the war will now have an even harder time of it. At various points during those months there were similarly orchestrated leaks—of claims about aluminum tubes supposedly being used in an Iraqi nuclear weapons program and of alleged ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda to name just two. And there were carefully prepared occasions where Bush officials took advantage of those leaks to advance the cause of war. The events of July 2003 demonstrate that this was a standard administration tactic, not an aberration. Given the circumstances, the need for a “Phase II” investigation of the political use of intelligence for the Iraq war becomes inescapable.
The most important aspect of the new evidence is that it locates the center of the effort to discredit Ambassador Wilson, and of the actions taken to further that aim, squarely within the Oval Office. If that project rose to the level of a criminal conspiracy, or if anything done to further that goal was in fact illegal, it is George W. Bush who must be called to account. That is a very troubling development indeed. The censure motion introduced by Wisconsin Senator Russell Feingold may turn out to be merely the opening salvo in a very intense political battle.
John Prados
April 07, 2006
John Prados is a senior fellow of the National Security Archive in Washington, D.C., and author of Hoodwinked: The Documents that Reveal How Bush Sold Us a War (The New Press).
The irony is so thick you can cut it with a knife. Just a few months ago defenders of the Bush administration were lambasting Justice Department prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald for engaging in a fishing expedition that might hurt President George W. Bush. The pundits considered Fitzgerald’s indictment for perjury of former vice-presidential aide I. Lewis (“Scooter”) Libby to be politically motivated and wrong.
To recap, Libby’s alleged perjury occurred during his testimony to a grand jury investigating the blown cover of CIA clandestine officer Valerie Plame Wilson, bound up in a White House bid to neutralize criticism of the Iraq war. The Plame affair started as an effort to discredit Ambassador Joseph Wilson, whom the CIA had sent to Niger to look into charges that Iraq was buying uranium ore there. Wilson found nothing to substantiate the claim and subsequently became a critic of Bush’s resort to war. His wife was outed in an attempt to undermine Wilson’s charges.
Continued legal filings in the case now reveal Prosecutor Fitzgerald as a guardian of White House secrets and Scooter Libby plus his defense team as assiduously implicating President Bush. For those who questioned George Bush’s modus operandi in the months leading up to the invasion of Iraq and afterwards these are perhaps not unexpected developments. But the gradual emergence of the contents of the Libby grand jury testimony is important not only because it contradicts the president’s public denials of the leaks, but also for potentially placing the president at the center of a smear campaign.
Prosecutor Fitzgerald’s April 5 response to the Libby team’s latest motion to compel discovery of a vast array of documents discloses that Vice President Dick Cheney told Libby that President Bush had “specifically” authorized officials in the summer of 2003 to reveal certain contents of the secret U.S. National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on alleged Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. There will be an argument over whether Bush or Cheney actually had that authority (which is vested in the Director of Central Intelligence by a law on the books since 1949) but that is not the concern here. Rather, the disclosure of this deliberate Bush leak—given to Judith Miller of The New York Times and others—provides new evidence that the White House regarded the top secret NIE not as an intelligence appreciation but as fodder for political warfare. In fact on July 12 Cheney ordered Libby to speak to the press about the NIE.
The new evidence also says something about Bush secrecy. This administration has moved on many levels to restrict public—and even official—access to information. Cutting off flows of data formerly routinely provided to Congress or the public, defenestrating access to the records of former presidents mandated by the Presidential Records Act, curbing the Freedom of Information Act, refusing to describe to Congress its domestic communications interception program and most recently reclassifying documents in the public domain for years. Suddenly we see President Bush, without a care, releasing secret records he felt would bolster his case.
Moreover, the way in which this was done should send shudders down the spine: according to the Fitzgerald filing, Scooter Libby told the grand jury that “he understood that even in the days following his conversation with Ms. Miller, other key officials—including Cabinet level officials—were not made aware of the earlier declassification even as those officials were pressed to carry out a declassification of the NIE, the report about Wilson’s trip and another classified document dated January 24, 2003,” evidently a reference to the materials assembled by CIA officer Robert Walpole regarding Iraq’s weapons programs and used for Secretary of State Colin L. Powell’s speech to the United Nations Security Council a couple of weeks later. If Libby’s testimony is accurate, documents were to be simultaneously deemed secret and declassified, depending upon White House whim, convenience, or legal liability.
This is the same administration that is seeking to prosecute those who leaked information considered less favorable to its cause, such as the fact of the National Security Agency’s dubious domestic spying program or the existence of the CIA’s secret prison network. Under the interpretation of the Espionage Act the Bush Justice Department is using to prosecute two former employees of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, even reporters who gain access to such information, media that inform the public of it, or persons who merely possess the information are currently at risk, although the statute appears to criminalize only the act of leaking. Indeed, the law makes it necessary for the NIE data not to be classified in order for Libby to legally leak it. There may be an argument here that under the Bush interpretation of the statute the act of declassification to abet a leak could amount to a criminal conspiracy, in this case by President George Bush himself.
Those who contend that there was no Bush effort to make political use of intelligence in the months leading up to the war will now have an even harder time of it. At various points during those months there were similarly orchestrated leaks—of claims about aluminum tubes supposedly being used in an Iraqi nuclear weapons program and of alleged ties between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda to name just two. And there were carefully prepared occasions where Bush officials took advantage of those leaks to advance the cause of war. The events of July 2003 demonstrate that this was a standard administration tactic, not an aberration. Given the circumstances, the need for a “Phase II” investigation of the political use of intelligence for the Iraq war becomes inescapable.
The most important aspect of the new evidence is that it locates the center of the effort to discredit Ambassador Wilson, and of the actions taken to further that aim, squarely within the Oval Office. If that project rose to the level of a criminal conspiracy, or if anything done to further that goal was in fact illegal, it is George W. Bush who must be called to account. That is a very troubling development indeed. The censure motion introduced by Wisconsin Senator Russell Feingold may turn out to be merely the opening salvo in a very intense political battle.
Friday, April 07, 2006
Bush at Center of Intelligence Leak
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report
Thursday 06 April 2006
Attorneys and current and former White House officials close to the investigation into the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson said Thursday that President Bush gave Vice President Dick Cheney the authorization in mid-June 2003 to disclose a portion of the highly sensitive National Intelligence Estimate to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and former New York Times reporter Judith Miller.
These current and former White House officials are among the 36 witnesses who have testified before a grand jury and have been cooperating with the special counsel's probe since its inception.
The officials, some of whom are attorneys close to the case, added that more than two dozen emails that the vice president's office said it recently discovered and handed over to leak investigators in February show that President Bush was kept up to date about the circumstances surrounding the effort to discredit former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
The sources indicated that the leak probe is now winding down, and that soon, new information will emerge from the special counsel's office that will prove President Bush had prior knowledge of the White House campaign to discredit Plame Wilson's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who accused the administration of "twisting" intelligence on the Iraqi threat in order to win public support for the war.
The new information that surfaced late Wednesday places President Bush at the center of the probe for the first time since the investigation into the leak began more than two years ago and raises new questions as to whether Bush knew in advance the lengths to which senior White House officials went to discredit Wilson.
In the court filing, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald wrote that Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "testified that he was specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose the key judgments of the classified NIE to [former New York Times reporter Judith] Miller on that occasion because it was thought that the NIE was 'pretty definitive' against what Ambassador Wilson had said and that the Vice President thought that it was 'very important' for the key judgments of the NIE to come out."
"Defendant further testified that he at first advised the Vice President that he could not have this conversation with reporter Miller because of the classified nature of the NIE. Defendant testified that the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized defendant to disclose the relevant portions of the NIE," the filing further states. "Defendant testified that he also spoke to David Addington, then Counsel to the Vice President, whom defendant considered to be an expert in national security law, and Mr. Addington opined that Presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to a declassification of the document. Defendant testified that he thought he brought a brief abstract of the NIE's key judgments to the meeting with Miller on July 8. Defendant understood that he was to tell Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the NIE held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium. Defendant testified that this July 8th meeting was the only time he recalled in his government experience when he disclosed a document to a reporter that was effectively declassified by virtue of the President's authorization that it be disclosed. Defendant testified that one of the reasons why he met with Miller at a hotel was the fact that he was sharing this information with Miller exclusively."
In October 2003, three months after Plame Wilson's CIA status and identity were unmasked in print by columnist Robert Novak, President Bush said publicly that it was unlikely that the individual who leaked her name would ever be found.
"I mean this is a town full of people who like to leak information," Bush said during a press conference on Oct. 7, 2003. "And I don't know if we're going to find out the senior administration official. Now, this is a large administration, and there's lots of senior officials. I don't have any idea."
Details of President Bush's involvement in the effort to counter the former ambassador's claims came in a court document filed late Wednesday evening in US District Court in Washington by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, which was first reported by the New York Sun newspaper.
President Bush retained a private attorney when he was interviewed in the leak probe two years ago, specifically about whether he knew about it or had authorized it.
According to four attorneys who over the past two days have read a transcript of the President Bush's interview with investigators, Bush did not disclose to either investigators or the special counsel that he had authorized Cheney or any other administration official to leak portions of the NIE to Woodward and Miller or any other reporter. Rather, these people said the president said he frowned upon "selective leaks."
Bush also said during the interview two years ago that he had no prior knowledge that anyone on his staff had been involved in a campaign to discredit Wilson or that individuals retaliated against the former ambassador by leaking his wife's undercover identity to reporters.
The 39-page court document Fitzgerald filed late Wednesday included previously unreported testimony given to a grand jury by Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby was indicted in October on five-counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators about how he discovered Plame Wilson's identity.
Libby testified that Cheney had received explicit instruction from President Bush to declassify a portion of the October 2002 NIE that said Iraq tried to purchase 500 tons of yellowcake uranium ore from Niger and share that information with reporters like Miller and Woodward, whose previous work proved to be sympathetic to the administration and would help to discredit Wilson, according to the court document and attorneys and current and former administration officials close to the investigation.
Libby's "participation in a critical conversation with Judith Miller on July 8 (discussed further below) occurred only after the Vice President advised defendant that the President specifically had authorized defendant to disclose certain information in the NIE," the Fitzgerald's filing states. "Defendant testified that the circumstances of his conversation with reporter Miller - getting approval from the President through the Vice President to discuss material that would be classified but for that approval - were unique in his recollection."
"Defendant further testified that on July 12, 2003, he was specifically directed by the Vice President to speak to the press in place of Cathie Martin (then the communications person for the Vice President) regarding the NIE and Wilson," the court filing states. "Defendant was instructed to provide what was for him an extremely rare "on the record" statement, and to provide "background" and "deep background" statements, and to provide information contained in a document defendant understood to be the cable authored by Mr. Wilson."
On June 27, 2003, two weeks before Libby's meeting with Miller and disclosing to her portions of the NIE, Libby met with Woodward, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, and leaked the portion of the NIE that dealt with Iraq's attempt to acquire uranium from Niger, which was first reported by this reporter in March.
A week or so earlier, Woodward met with two other government officials, one of whom told him in a "casual" and off-handed manner that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
Woodward said the meeting with Libby and the other government officials had been set up simply as "confidential background interviews for my 2004 book 'Plan of Attack' about the lead-up to the Iraq war, ongoing reporting for the Washington Post and research for a book on Bush's second term to be published in 2006."
Woodward wrote a first-person account for the Washington Post after he gave a sworn deposition to Fitzgerald about information he had learned about Valerie Plame Wilson. It was a shocking revelation at the time. Woodward had publicly discounted the importance of the Plame Wilson leak and had referred to Fitzgerald as a "junkyard dog" prosecutor. He then revealed in November that he had been told about Plame Wilson's CIA employment in June 2003 - before any other journalist.
The Watergate-era journalist wrote that when he met with Libby on June 27, 2003, "Libby discussed the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, mentioned "yellowcake" and said there was an effort by the Iraqis to get it from Africa. It goes back to February '02. This was the time of Wilson's trip to Niger."
The information in the NIE about Niger was still considered highly classified and extremely sensitive, and although Woodward had been the recipient of classified information on other occasions during the course of gathering material for his books, the data he was provided with concerning the NIE had been authorized by Cheney in order to rebut Wilson. Woodward never wrote a story for the Post about the intelligence information he was given.
President Bush signed an executive order in March 2003 authorizing Cheney to declassify certain intelligence documents. The executive order was signed on March 23, 2003, four days after the start of the Iraq war, and two weeks after Wilson first appeared on the administration's radar.
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report
Thursday 06 April 2006
Attorneys and current and former White House officials close to the investigation into the leak of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson said Thursday that President Bush gave Vice President Dick Cheney the authorization in mid-June 2003 to disclose a portion of the highly sensitive National Intelligence Estimate to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward and former New York Times reporter Judith Miller.
These current and former White House officials are among the 36 witnesses who have testified before a grand jury and have been cooperating with the special counsel's probe since its inception.
The officials, some of whom are attorneys close to the case, added that more than two dozen emails that the vice president's office said it recently discovered and handed over to leak investigators in February show that President Bush was kept up to date about the circumstances surrounding the effort to discredit former Ambassador Joseph Wilson.
The sources indicated that the leak probe is now winding down, and that soon, new information will emerge from the special counsel's office that will prove President Bush had prior knowledge of the White House campaign to discredit Plame Wilson's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who accused the administration of "twisting" intelligence on the Iraqi threat in order to win public support for the war.
The new information that surfaced late Wednesday places President Bush at the center of the probe for the first time since the investigation into the leak began more than two years ago and raises new questions as to whether Bush knew in advance the lengths to which senior White House officials went to discredit Wilson.
In the court filing, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald wrote that Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, "testified that he was specifically authorized in advance of the meeting to disclose the key judgments of the classified NIE to [former New York Times reporter Judith] Miller on that occasion because it was thought that the NIE was 'pretty definitive' against what Ambassador Wilson had said and that the Vice President thought that it was 'very important' for the key judgments of the NIE to come out."
"Defendant further testified that he at first advised the Vice President that he could not have this conversation with reporter Miller because of the classified nature of the NIE. Defendant testified that the Vice President later advised him that the President had authorized defendant to disclose the relevant portions of the NIE," the filing further states. "Defendant testified that he also spoke to David Addington, then Counsel to the Vice President, whom defendant considered to be an expert in national security law, and Mr. Addington opined that Presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to a declassification of the document. Defendant testified that he thought he brought a brief abstract of the NIE's key judgments to the meeting with Miller on July 8. Defendant understood that he was to tell Miller, among other things, that a key judgment of the NIE held that Iraq was 'vigorously trying to procure' uranium. Defendant testified that this July 8th meeting was the only time he recalled in his government experience when he disclosed a document to a reporter that was effectively declassified by virtue of the President's authorization that it be disclosed. Defendant testified that one of the reasons why he met with Miller at a hotel was the fact that he was sharing this information with Miller exclusively."
In October 2003, three months after Plame Wilson's CIA status and identity were unmasked in print by columnist Robert Novak, President Bush said publicly that it was unlikely that the individual who leaked her name would ever be found.
"I mean this is a town full of people who like to leak information," Bush said during a press conference on Oct. 7, 2003. "And I don't know if we're going to find out the senior administration official. Now, this is a large administration, and there's lots of senior officials. I don't have any idea."
Details of President Bush's involvement in the effort to counter the former ambassador's claims came in a court document filed late Wednesday evening in US District Court in Washington by Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, which was first reported by the New York Sun newspaper.
President Bush retained a private attorney when he was interviewed in the leak probe two years ago, specifically about whether he knew about it or had authorized it.
According to four attorneys who over the past two days have read a transcript of the President Bush's interview with investigators, Bush did not disclose to either investigators or the special counsel that he had authorized Cheney or any other administration official to leak portions of the NIE to Woodward and Miller or any other reporter. Rather, these people said the president said he frowned upon "selective leaks."
Bush also said during the interview two years ago that he had no prior knowledge that anyone on his staff had been involved in a campaign to discredit Wilson or that individuals retaliated against the former ambassador by leaking his wife's undercover identity to reporters.
The 39-page court document Fitzgerald filed late Wednesday included previously unreported testimony given to a grand jury by Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Libby was indicted in October on five-counts of perjury, obstruction of justice, and lying to investigators about how he discovered Plame Wilson's identity.
Libby testified that Cheney had received explicit instruction from President Bush to declassify a portion of the October 2002 NIE that said Iraq tried to purchase 500 tons of yellowcake uranium ore from Niger and share that information with reporters like Miller and Woodward, whose previous work proved to be sympathetic to the administration and would help to discredit Wilson, according to the court document and attorneys and current and former administration officials close to the investigation.
Libby's "participation in a critical conversation with Judith Miller on July 8 (discussed further below) occurred only after the Vice President advised defendant that the President specifically had authorized defendant to disclose certain information in the NIE," the Fitzgerald's filing states. "Defendant testified that the circumstances of his conversation with reporter Miller - getting approval from the President through the Vice President to discuss material that would be classified but for that approval - were unique in his recollection."
"Defendant further testified that on July 12, 2003, he was specifically directed by the Vice President to speak to the press in place of Cathie Martin (then the communications person for the Vice President) regarding the NIE and Wilson," the court filing states. "Defendant was instructed to provide what was for him an extremely rare "on the record" statement, and to provide "background" and "deep background" statements, and to provide information contained in a document defendant understood to be the cable authored by Mr. Wilson."
On June 27, 2003, two weeks before Libby's meeting with Miller and disclosing to her portions of the NIE, Libby met with Woodward, the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, and leaked the portion of the NIE that dealt with Iraq's attempt to acquire uranium from Niger, which was first reported by this reporter in March.
A week or so earlier, Woodward met with two other government officials, one of whom told him in a "casual" and off-handed manner that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA.
Woodward said the meeting with Libby and the other government officials had been set up simply as "confidential background interviews for my 2004 book 'Plan of Attack' about the lead-up to the Iraq war, ongoing reporting for the Washington Post and research for a book on Bush's second term to be published in 2006."
Woodward wrote a first-person account for the Washington Post after he gave a sworn deposition to Fitzgerald about information he had learned about Valerie Plame Wilson. It was a shocking revelation at the time. Woodward had publicly discounted the importance of the Plame Wilson leak and had referred to Fitzgerald as a "junkyard dog" prosecutor. He then revealed in November that he had been told about Plame Wilson's CIA employment in June 2003 - before any other journalist.
The Watergate-era journalist wrote that when he met with Libby on June 27, 2003, "Libby discussed the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, mentioned "yellowcake" and said there was an effort by the Iraqis to get it from Africa. It goes back to February '02. This was the time of Wilson's trip to Niger."
The information in the NIE about Niger was still considered highly classified and extremely sensitive, and although Woodward had been the recipient of classified information on other occasions during the course of gathering material for his books, the data he was provided with concerning the NIE had been authorized by Cheney in order to rebut Wilson. Woodward never wrote a story for the Post about the intelligence information he was given.
President Bush signed an executive order in March 2003 authorizing Cheney to declassify certain intelligence documents. The executive order was signed on March 23, 2003, four days after the start of the Iraq war, and two weeks after Wilson first appeared on the administration's radar.
Tuesday, March 07, 2006
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Here we are at the end of another month. Can you really believe that March is upon us? Can't wait for the Oscars. They will come on soon. Must speak in mono-syllabic grunts. Work is great, my love is doing great, we look forward to a year of change and growth. This post is beginning to read like fortune cookie.
Wednesday, February 01, 2006
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Squirrels attack dog!
Squirrels attack dog!
Squirrels have bitten to death a stray dog that was barking at them. Perhaps a fight over declining resources?
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
"CD’s affected by the Sony-BMG spyware
Posted Nov 15, 2005 04:57 PM PST on whatreallyhappened.com
Category: COMPUTERS/SECURITY
Needless to say I have received the usual batch of hate-emails from music pirates intent on not having to feel guilty about what they do and certainly not wishing to be seen as the ultimate cause of all this nonsense. Rather than waste a lot of space on the reader's letters page to what are essentially the same arguments over and over, here are the answers.
1. Hacking into computers to steal music is just as wrong as music companies hacking into computers to prevent it. Both are wrong, but keep in mind who acted first.
2. Music companies don't automatically make vast sums of money for music CDs. The retailers take most of it, taxes take the next biggest chunk.
3. Until you yourself actually produce and market a music CD or a DVD, you don't know what you are talking about when you spout off about how the music companies ought to behave.
4. The music companies are not crooks. The music pirates are the crooks."
***Response starts here:***
Dear WRH,
Sorry about the incomplete message I sent earlier, there must have been some spyware on my computer that I didn't know about, and it seems to have caused me to submit my message prematurely.
Here is my response to your "comments" that appear under the article summary.
1. Who's "hacking"? As I understand it, P2P, or a torrent needs tacit approval from each user that wants to "share" their music/movies/books. How is this different than the public library, a book loan to my friend, or letting my mom borrow a cd? If I go to the library and "borrow" a Stephen King novel...how does Stephen King make any money off of that? Can I not "loan" a dvd to my family, or a book to a co-worker?
2. If music companies didn't make money off of music distribution...they would be in an entirely different business altogether.
3. I have "produced" music and movies. I am an actor/writer/musician with over 30 movies under my belt, and I engineer/produce music and have made money writing screenplays. I do it because I love to make art, and if I had a choice between never letting my stuff be seen or heard, and starving to death because I couldn't make money off of it....well, I'm pretty hungry these days. Producers consistently profit off of artists with no conscience. Look at the latest Screen Actor's Guild statements regarding internet/dvd profit sharing, and how unfair producers have always been when it comes to paying actors for the exploitation of their efforts.
4. Both music companies and pirates are crooks. Imagine if books were monitered and tracked like downloaded music is. Not everyone can afford a copy of "1984" or "Watership Down". So is it fair that the economically strong are the only ones "allowed" to read such material? Stealing anything is wrong. It just depends on what you consider "stealing". How come songs listened to on the radio and movies shown on broadcast television are "free"? Oh, that's right, there are corporations advertising their products and services and your "cost" is a listen to or a look at their commercials.
No wonder there is so much crappy music on the radio.
No wonder movies suck these days.
Greed.
Not there's anything wrong with that.
I believe everyone, man, woman and child, has the right to see, hear and feel art that was specifically created to be shared. Just like your website. Wouldn't it be cruel if the Katrina victims were thrown in jail because they were trying to learn the truth, yet they couldn't afford an internet connection, so they had to read it off of an illegally printed hard copy of your content? Don't you think we have the basic human right to hear each other's stories, and learn from each others life experiences?
Respectfully yours,
Keith Coogan
S.A.G./A.F.T.R.A. member since 1976.
P.S. Keep up the good work. Instead of watching CBS/NBC/ABC/CNN/FOXNEWS, I faithfully read WRH, RENSE and DRUDGEREPORT on a daily basis, but not necessarily in that order.
Posted Nov 15, 2005 04:57 PM PST on whatreallyhappened.com
Category: COMPUTERS/SECURITY
Needless to say I have received the usual batch of hate-emails from music pirates intent on not having to feel guilty about what they do and certainly not wishing to be seen as the ultimate cause of all this nonsense. Rather than waste a lot of space on the reader's letters page to what are essentially the same arguments over and over, here are the answers.
1. Hacking into computers to steal music is just as wrong as music companies hacking into computers to prevent it. Both are wrong, but keep in mind who acted first.
2. Music companies don't automatically make vast sums of money for music CDs. The retailers take most of it, taxes take the next biggest chunk.
3. Until you yourself actually produce and market a music CD or a DVD, you don't know what you are talking about when you spout off about how the music companies ought to behave.
4. The music companies are not crooks. The music pirates are the crooks."
***Response starts here:***
Dear WRH,
Sorry about the incomplete message I sent earlier, there must have been some spyware on my computer that I didn't know about, and it seems to have caused me to submit my message prematurely.
Here is my response to your "comments" that appear under the article summary.
1. Who's "hacking"? As I understand it, P2P, or a torrent needs tacit approval from each user that wants to "share" their music/movies/books. How is this different than the public library, a book loan to my friend, or letting my mom borrow a cd? If I go to the library and "borrow" a Stephen King novel...how does Stephen King make any money off of that? Can I not "loan" a dvd to my family, or a book to a co-worker?
2. If music companies didn't make money off of music distribution...they would be in an entirely different business altogether.
3. I have "produced" music and movies. I am an actor/writer/musician with over 30 movies under my belt, and I engineer/produce music and have made money writing screenplays. I do it because I love to make art, and if I had a choice between never letting my stuff be seen or heard, and starving to death because I couldn't make money off of it....well, I'm pretty hungry these days. Producers consistently profit off of artists with no conscience. Look at the latest Screen Actor's Guild statements regarding internet/dvd profit sharing, and how unfair producers have always been when it comes to paying actors for the exploitation of their efforts.
4. Both music companies and pirates are crooks. Imagine if books were monitered and tracked like downloaded music is. Not everyone can afford a copy of "1984" or "Watership Down". So is it fair that the economically strong are the only ones "allowed" to read such material? Stealing anything is wrong. It just depends on what you consider "stealing". How come songs listened to on the radio and movies shown on broadcast television are "free"? Oh, that's right, there are corporations advertising their products and services and your "cost" is a listen to or a look at their commercials.
No wonder there is so much crappy music on the radio.
No wonder movies suck these days.
Greed.
Not there's anything wrong with that.
I believe everyone, man, woman and child, has the right to see, hear and feel art that was specifically created to be shared. Just like your website. Wouldn't it be cruel if the Katrina victims were thrown in jail because they were trying to learn the truth, yet they couldn't afford an internet connection, so they had to read it off of an illegally printed hard copy of your content? Don't you think we have the basic human right to hear each other's stories, and learn from each others life experiences?
Respectfully yours,
Keith Coogan
S.A.G./A.F.T.R.A. member since 1976.
P.S. Keep up the good work. Instead of watching CBS/NBC/ABC/CNN/FOXNEWS, I faithfully read WRH, RENSE and DRUDGEREPORT on a daily basis, but not necessarily in that order.
Thursday, November 10, 2005
If you haven't been watching THE BEST SHOW ON TELEVISION, then I suggest you join us Wednesday nights at 9:00 P.M. on ABC.
Friday, September 23, 2005
The following is perhaps the most compelling argument ever to air on national television. I don't know who won, but I do know that Bill is a big bullie, and Phil is one smart cookie. It is only because of his extensive television experience that Phil was able to even get a word in edgewise, and it is the only time I have seen any guest make Bill concede on ANY issue. Please read the transcripts below, or go to FoxNews.com to watch the video in full.
-------------
PHIL DONAHUE, FORMER TALK SHOW HOST: Let's understand what's happening here. Once again we have a woman who got to be just a little too famous for the people who support this war. A minority of the American population, by the way. And so the effort to marginalize this woman is underway. And you're helping out.
BILLY O'REILLY: I'm — I'm the leader of the pack.
DONAHUE: You're suggesting...
O'REILLY: I'm the leader of the pack.
DONAHUE: First of all, Cindy Sheehan is one tough mother. And nothing you say or anyone else is going to slow her down.
O'REILLY: No, that's fine. She has a right to do that.
DONAHUE: You can't hurt her. She's already taken the biggest punch in the nose that a woman can take. She's lost a son.
O'REILLY: OK.
DONAHUE: She's lost a child.
O'REILLY: But look, I'm not putting words in her mouth.
DONAHUE: And by the way, she is going to be at the center of one of the largest rallies since the Vietnam War: proud, patriotic Americans who will show up in Washington this week for one of the most massive, largest demonstrations, protest demonstrations...
O'REILLY: And we'll cover it.
DONAHUE: ... right outside the president's window.
O'REILLY: And we'll cover it.
DONAHUE: And FOX is in the business of saying that this woman is somehow saying un-American things. Hyperbole.
O'REILLY: No, no, no, no.
DONAHUE: Listen to what she's saying.
O'REILLY: Nobody said she said anything un-American. We say that her positions are radical. And they are radical.
DONAHUE: Let me tell you what's radical. What's radical is to send more Americans to die in this war, which is a monumental blunder...
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: ... by a president who swaggered us into it with, by the way, the at least tacit approval of the Democratic Party. There's a lot of sin to go around here.
O'REILLY: What's radical...
DONAHUE: You want to send more people to this war? Is that your position?
O'REILLY: If we cut and run out of there like you want to do, we would be putting every American in a thousand times more jeopardy than they're in now.
DONAHUE: We're going to cut and run anyway, Bill.
O'REILLY: Well, that's your opinion.
DONAHUE: It's not my opinion. American military leaders have said we're going to draw down, beginning next year. The reason they said that...
O'REILLY: There's a difference between drawing down and cutting and running.
DONAHUE: Well...
O'REILLY: You're a cut and run guy, and I don't want my family in danger because of you.
DONAHUE: You want to stay the course, don't you? You don't...
O'REILLY: Look, here's what I want to do. I want to give the Iraqis a chance to train their army so they can defeat these people who are trying to turn it into a terrorist state.
DONAHUE: Bill...
O'REILLY: That's what I want to do.
DONAHUE: Bill...
O'REILLY: Go.
DONAHUE: Iraq was not a terrorist state.
O'REILLY: Oh, no.
(CROSSTALK)
DONAHUE: I hope I don't patronize you for thinking that.
O'REILLY: He was a swell guy. He was...
DONAHUE: Saddam — Saddam was a bastard. But he was our bastard.
O'REILLY: He wasn't anybody's...
DONAHUE: Donald Rumsfeld shook his hand in the '80s.
O'REILLY: Well, that's true (ph).
DONAHUE: You saw the pictures. Now listen. Listen. You wouldn't send your children to this war, Bill.
O'REILLY: My nephew just enlisted in the Army. You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
DONAHUE: Very good. Very good. Congratulations. Be proud.
O'REILLY: Yes, and he's a patriot, so don't denigrate his service or I'll boot you right off the set.
DONAHUE: I'm not — I'm not...
O'REILLY: That boy made a decision to serve his country. Do not denigrate him or you're out of here.
DONAHUE: I'm not Jeremy Glick, Billy. You can't intimidate me.
O'REILLY: That's right. A little bit more intelligent than he is.
DONAHUE: I'm not somebody you can come and just do all your...
O'REILLY: Don't tell me I wouldn't send my kids.
DONAHUE: Loud doesn't mean right.
O'REILLY: My nephew just enlisted. You don't know what you're talking about.
DONAHUE: All right. You — your nephew is not your kid. You are...
O'REILLY: He's my blood.
DONAHUE: You are part of a loud group of people who want to prove they're tough and send other people's kids to war to make the case.
O'REILLY: You have no clue about how to fight a war on terror or how to defend your country. You are clueless. So is Ms. Sheehan. For Ms. Sheehan to say that the insurgents have a right to kill Americans, and you're shaking her hand? You ought to just walk away.
DONAHUE: How many more young men and women are you going to send to have their arms and legs blown off...
O'REILLY: This is a war on terror.
DONAHUE: ... so that you can be tough and point at people in a kind of cowardly way...
O'REILLY: No.
DONAHUE: ... take people like Jeremy Glick, who comes on to, in memory of his parents...
O'REILLY: Oh, bull.
DONAHUE: ... and you go off on him...
O'REILLY: Jeremy Glick is...
DONAHUE: ... like a big bully. Do you feel that you have to be — you have to feel sorry about that.
O'REILLY: Mr. Donahue, with all due respect...
DONAHUE: Have you apologized to him for that?
O'REILLY: Baloney. Jeremy Glick came on this program...
DONAHUE: You know what I'm talking about?
O'REILLY: ... and accused the president of the United States...
DONAHUE: Oh, and you had...
O'REILLY: ... of orchestrating 9/11. That's what he did, right after 9/11 happened. Do you know what the pain that brought the families who lost people in 9/11?
DONAHUE: This war...
O'REILLY: You buy into left-wing propaganda...
DONAHUE: This war...
O'REILLY: ... and you're a mouthpiece for it. Go ahead.
DONAHUE: This war is not fair to the American troops. This war is unconstitutional. This war turned its back on the people who framed the most fabulous document in the history of civilization. I speak of the United States Constitution.
O'REILLY: Why — why isn't the Democratic...
DONAHUE: This — we have — by the way...
O'REILLY: ... Party speaking that way?
DONAHUE: I'm sorry that it isn't. I am. But let's understand something.
O'REILLY: Are we all — are we all so misguided?
DONAHUE: Twenty-one — excuse me. Twenty-one Democrats in the Senate voted against this war, as well as Jeffords, an independent. And may the Lord shine his blessings down upon Lincoln Chaffee...
O'REILLY: All right. I'm going to give you...
DONAHUE: ... the only — I'm almost finished, Billy.
O'REILLY: I'm going to give you the last word.
DONAHUE: I'm almost finished.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: Lincoln Chaffee, the only Republican in the Senate to vote against this war. We should be building statues to all these people.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: October 2002, they stood up to a president and they knew that, first of all, only Congress can declare war. Why is that unimportant to you, Billy?
O'REILLY: It's not — I'm not...
DONAHUE: Why can't you become the patriot that your loud voice proclaims to be?
O'REILLY: A loud voice...
DONAHUE: And stand behind the Constitution and insist that we never go to war again without the approval — and...
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: ... the United States Congress.
O'REILLY: If they want to take action, they can take action. Now I want to say something, I'm going to give you the last word. The Iraq war is not something that I embrace. It absolutely could be a tactical error.
DONAHUE: Well, you should...
O'REILLY: All right?
DONAHUE: It's hard to know this, Billy.
O'REILLY: Listen to me and then you're going to have the last word. Not something I embrace, could be a tactical error, optional war and we have not waged it the way I had hoped we would wage it.
DONAHUE: But what?
O'REILLY: But we are in the war on terror.
DONAHUE: You want kids to die (ph).
O'REILLY: We are in the war on terror. Our cause is noble.
DONAHUE: It has nothing to do with the war on terror.
O'REILLY: Yes, it does. And if you don't understand geopolitics and you don't understand Iraq would be a terrorist state if we pulled out of there...
DONAHUE: The mistake...
O'REILLY: ... you don't know anything.
DONAHUE: ... it was poorly planned...
O'REILLY: Go ahead.
DONAHUE: ... poorly executed, but Bill O'Reilly wants to send more kids to fight and die. We've already had almost 2,000. Just let me have the last word. In the last year, two things have doubled. The number of dead American troops in Iraq have doubled, from over 1,000 to almost 2,000. You know what else doubled, Billy? The price of Halliburton's stock.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: From $33 to $66. That doesn't shame you? That doesn't make you wonder?
O'REILLY: I'm not obsessed by Halliburton stock.
DONAHUE: If this is an enterprise that is worth the support of the American people? We need you at this rally on Saturday, Billy.
O'REILLY: I don't care. I'm not going to be there.
DONAHUE: We need you out in front of it to be — to protest.
O'REILLY: Not going to be at the rally.
DONAHUE: There is no democracy without dissent.
O'REILLY: Not going to protest.
DONAHUE: You should be proud of people who stand up and dissent.
O'REILLY: I am. I respect your...
DONAHUE: A lot of fine men went and died to give me that freedom.
O'REILLY: All right. You got it. You got it. I respect your dissent. I think you're way off in your analysis of the war on terror.
DONAHUE: You want to send more people to die in Iraq? Is that — is that your position?
O'REILLY: I want to win the war in Iraq.
DONAHUE: Win. What does win mean? Tell me what win means.
O'REILLY: It means those people have a chance at democracy. I've got to go.
DONAHUE: How long is that going to take?
O'REILLY: Got to go.
DONAHUE: How long is that going to take?
O'REILLY: Those people deserve a chance at freedom. Thank you for coming in.
-------------
PHIL DONAHUE, FORMER TALK SHOW HOST: Let's understand what's happening here. Once again we have a woman who got to be just a little too famous for the people who support this war. A minority of the American population, by the way. And so the effort to marginalize this woman is underway. And you're helping out.
BILLY O'REILLY: I'm — I'm the leader of the pack.
DONAHUE: You're suggesting...
O'REILLY: I'm the leader of the pack.
DONAHUE: First of all, Cindy Sheehan is one tough mother. And nothing you say or anyone else is going to slow her down.
O'REILLY: No, that's fine. She has a right to do that.
DONAHUE: You can't hurt her. She's already taken the biggest punch in the nose that a woman can take. She's lost a son.
O'REILLY: OK.
DONAHUE: She's lost a child.
O'REILLY: But look, I'm not putting words in her mouth.
DONAHUE: And by the way, she is going to be at the center of one of the largest rallies since the Vietnam War: proud, patriotic Americans who will show up in Washington this week for one of the most massive, largest demonstrations, protest demonstrations...
O'REILLY: And we'll cover it.
DONAHUE: ... right outside the president's window.
O'REILLY: And we'll cover it.
DONAHUE: And FOX is in the business of saying that this woman is somehow saying un-American things. Hyperbole.
O'REILLY: No, no, no, no.
DONAHUE: Listen to what she's saying.
O'REILLY: Nobody said she said anything un-American. We say that her positions are radical. And they are radical.
DONAHUE: Let me tell you what's radical. What's radical is to send more Americans to die in this war, which is a monumental blunder...
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: ... by a president who swaggered us into it with, by the way, the at least tacit approval of the Democratic Party. There's a lot of sin to go around here.
O'REILLY: What's radical...
DONAHUE: You want to send more people to this war? Is that your position?
O'REILLY: If we cut and run out of there like you want to do, we would be putting every American in a thousand times more jeopardy than they're in now.
DONAHUE: We're going to cut and run anyway, Bill.
O'REILLY: Well, that's your opinion.
DONAHUE: It's not my opinion. American military leaders have said we're going to draw down, beginning next year. The reason they said that...
O'REILLY: There's a difference between drawing down and cutting and running.
DONAHUE: Well...
O'REILLY: You're a cut and run guy, and I don't want my family in danger because of you.
DONAHUE: You want to stay the course, don't you? You don't...
O'REILLY: Look, here's what I want to do. I want to give the Iraqis a chance to train their army so they can defeat these people who are trying to turn it into a terrorist state.
DONAHUE: Bill...
O'REILLY: That's what I want to do.
DONAHUE: Bill...
O'REILLY: Go.
DONAHUE: Iraq was not a terrorist state.
O'REILLY: Oh, no.
(CROSSTALK)
DONAHUE: I hope I don't patronize you for thinking that.
O'REILLY: He was a swell guy. He was...
DONAHUE: Saddam — Saddam was a bastard. But he was our bastard.
O'REILLY: He wasn't anybody's...
DONAHUE: Donald Rumsfeld shook his hand in the '80s.
O'REILLY: Well, that's true (ph).
DONAHUE: You saw the pictures. Now listen. Listen. You wouldn't send your children to this war, Bill.
O'REILLY: My nephew just enlisted in the Army. You don't know what the hell you're talking about.
DONAHUE: Very good. Very good. Congratulations. Be proud.
O'REILLY: Yes, and he's a patriot, so don't denigrate his service or I'll boot you right off the set.
DONAHUE: I'm not — I'm not...
O'REILLY: That boy made a decision to serve his country. Do not denigrate him or you're out of here.
DONAHUE: I'm not Jeremy Glick, Billy. You can't intimidate me.
O'REILLY: That's right. A little bit more intelligent than he is.
DONAHUE: I'm not somebody you can come and just do all your...
O'REILLY: Don't tell me I wouldn't send my kids.
DONAHUE: Loud doesn't mean right.
O'REILLY: My nephew just enlisted. You don't know what you're talking about.
DONAHUE: All right. You — your nephew is not your kid. You are...
O'REILLY: He's my blood.
DONAHUE: You are part of a loud group of people who want to prove they're tough and send other people's kids to war to make the case.
O'REILLY: You have no clue about how to fight a war on terror or how to defend your country. You are clueless. So is Ms. Sheehan. For Ms. Sheehan to say that the insurgents have a right to kill Americans, and you're shaking her hand? You ought to just walk away.
DONAHUE: How many more young men and women are you going to send to have their arms and legs blown off...
O'REILLY: This is a war on terror.
DONAHUE: ... so that you can be tough and point at people in a kind of cowardly way...
O'REILLY: No.
DONAHUE: ... take people like Jeremy Glick, who comes on to, in memory of his parents...
O'REILLY: Oh, bull.
DONAHUE: ... and you go off on him...
O'REILLY: Jeremy Glick is...
DONAHUE: ... like a big bully. Do you feel that you have to be — you have to feel sorry about that.
O'REILLY: Mr. Donahue, with all due respect...
DONAHUE: Have you apologized to him for that?
O'REILLY: Baloney. Jeremy Glick came on this program...
DONAHUE: You know what I'm talking about?
O'REILLY: ... and accused the president of the United States...
DONAHUE: Oh, and you had...
O'REILLY: ... of orchestrating 9/11. That's what he did, right after 9/11 happened. Do you know what the pain that brought the families who lost people in 9/11?
DONAHUE: This war...
O'REILLY: You buy into left-wing propaganda...
DONAHUE: This war...
O'REILLY: ... and you're a mouthpiece for it. Go ahead.
DONAHUE: This war is not fair to the American troops. This war is unconstitutional. This war turned its back on the people who framed the most fabulous document in the history of civilization. I speak of the United States Constitution.
O'REILLY: Why — why isn't the Democratic...
DONAHUE: This — we have — by the way...
O'REILLY: ... Party speaking that way?
DONAHUE: I'm sorry that it isn't. I am. But let's understand something.
O'REILLY: Are we all — are we all so misguided?
DONAHUE: Twenty-one — excuse me. Twenty-one Democrats in the Senate voted against this war, as well as Jeffords, an independent. And may the Lord shine his blessings down upon Lincoln Chaffee...
O'REILLY: All right. I'm going to give you...
DONAHUE: ... the only — I'm almost finished, Billy.
O'REILLY: I'm going to give you the last word.
DONAHUE: I'm almost finished.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: Lincoln Chaffee, the only Republican in the Senate to vote against this war. We should be building statues to all these people.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: October 2002, they stood up to a president and they knew that, first of all, only Congress can declare war. Why is that unimportant to you, Billy?
O'REILLY: It's not — I'm not...
DONAHUE: Why can't you become the patriot that your loud voice proclaims to be?
O'REILLY: A loud voice...
DONAHUE: And stand behind the Constitution and insist that we never go to war again without the approval — and...
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: ... the United States Congress.
O'REILLY: If they want to take action, they can take action. Now I want to say something, I'm going to give you the last word. The Iraq war is not something that I embrace. It absolutely could be a tactical error.
DONAHUE: Well, you should...
O'REILLY: All right?
DONAHUE: It's hard to know this, Billy.
O'REILLY: Listen to me and then you're going to have the last word. Not something I embrace, could be a tactical error, optional war and we have not waged it the way I had hoped we would wage it.
DONAHUE: But what?
O'REILLY: But we are in the war on terror.
DONAHUE: You want kids to die (ph).
O'REILLY: We are in the war on terror. Our cause is noble.
DONAHUE: It has nothing to do with the war on terror.
O'REILLY: Yes, it does. And if you don't understand geopolitics and you don't understand Iraq would be a terrorist state if we pulled out of there...
DONAHUE: The mistake...
O'REILLY: ... you don't know anything.
DONAHUE: ... it was poorly planned...
O'REILLY: Go ahead.
DONAHUE: ... poorly executed, but Bill O'Reilly wants to send more kids to fight and die. We've already had almost 2,000. Just let me have the last word. In the last year, two things have doubled. The number of dead American troops in Iraq have doubled, from over 1,000 to almost 2,000. You know what else doubled, Billy? The price of Halliburton's stock.
O'REILLY: All right.
DONAHUE: From $33 to $66. That doesn't shame you? That doesn't make you wonder?
O'REILLY: I'm not obsessed by Halliburton stock.
DONAHUE: If this is an enterprise that is worth the support of the American people? We need you at this rally on Saturday, Billy.
O'REILLY: I don't care. I'm not going to be there.
DONAHUE: We need you out in front of it to be — to protest.
O'REILLY: Not going to be at the rally.
DONAHUE: There is no democracy without dissent.
O'REILLY: Not going to protest.
DONAHUE: You should be proud of people who stand up and dissent.
O'REILLY: I am. I respect your...
DONAHUE: A lot of fine men went and died to give me that freedom.
O'REILLY: All right. You got it. You got it. I respect your dissent. I think you're way off in your analysis of the war on terror.
DONAHUE: You want to send more people to die in Iraq? Is that — is that your position?
O'REILLY: I want to win the war in Iraq.
DONAHUE: Win. What does win mean? Tell me what win means.
O'REILLY: It means those people have a chance at democracy. I've got to go.
DONAHUE: How long is that going to take?
O'REILLY: Got to go.
DONAHUE: How long is that going to take?
O'REILLY: Those people deserve a chance at freedom. Thank you for coming in.
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Monday, June 06, 2005
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Friday, May 06, 2005
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Wednesday, April 20, 2005
I don't know how long the beta test will last but...
Zabasearch
..is the coolest stalker tool I have ever seen!
Try it. It's Zaba! (greek for free)
Zabasearch
..is the coolest stalker tool I have ever seen!
Try it. It's Zaba! (greek for free)
Friday, March 25, 2005
Monday, March 14, 2005
If you are wheelchair bound, unable to hold a rifle, or otherwise would like to shoot things from the comfort or your own computer, then Live-Shot.com has exactly what you're looking for.
Thursday, March 10, 2005
Public version of Saddam capture fiction:
[World News]: RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, March 9 : A former U.S. Marine who participated in capturing ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein said the public version of his capture was fabricated.
Ex-Sgt.Nadim Abou Rabeh, of Lebanese descent, was quoted in the Saudi daily al-Medina Wednesday as saying Saddam was actually captured Friday, Dec. 12, 2003, and not the day after, as announced by the U.S. Army.
"I was among the 20-man unit, including eight of Arab descent, who searched for Saddam for three days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and we found him in a modest home in a small village and not in a hole as announced," Abou Rabeh said.
"We captured him after fierce resistance during which a Marine of Sudanese origin was killed," he said.
He said Saddam himself fired at them with a gun from the window of a room on the second floor.Then they shouted at him in Arabic: "You have to surrender. ...There is no point in resisting."
"Later on, a military production team fabricated the film of Saddam's capture in a hole, which was in fact a deserted well," Abou Rabeh said.
Abou Rabeh was interviewed in Lebanon.
- -- Copyright 2005 by United Press International.
[World News]: RIYADH, Saudi Arabia, March 9 : A former U.S. Marine who participated in capturing ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein said the public version of his capture was fabricated.
Ex-Sgt.Nadim Abou Rabeh, of Lebanese descent, was quoted in the Saudi daily al-Medina Wednesday as saying Saddam was actually captured Friday, Dec. 12, 2003, and not the day after, as announced by the U.S. Army.
"I was among the 20-man unit, including eight of Arab descent, who searched for Saddam for three days in the area of Dour near Tikrit, and we found him in a modest home in a small village and not in a hole as announced," Abou Rabeh said.
"We captured him after fierce resistance during which a Marine of Sudanese origin was killed," he said.
He said Saddam himself fired at them with a gun from the window of a room on the second floor.Then they shouted at him in Arabic: "You have to surrender. ...There is no point in resisting."
"Later on, a military production team fabricated the film of Saddam's capture in a hole, which was in fact a deserted well," Abou Rabeh said.
Abou Rabeh was interviewed in Lebanon.
- -- Copyright 2005 by United Press International.
Friday, March 04, 2005
(Reprinted with permission from Rip Rense)
WAR ON DRUGS (copyright 2005 Rip Rense)
Drugs, as we know, are evil. This is why Nancy Reagan told everyone to "just say no." This is why countless millions---er, billions---are spent fighting the "War on Drugs" instead of on, say, schools. (Gee, isn't it funny how drugs are more plentiful and popular than ever, anyhow?)
This is why Tommy Chong was thrown in jail for selling water-pipes.
This is why we have lots of "operatives" in the cocaine republics of South America doing strange things that we rarely hear about (especially when good reporters who write about them, like the late Gary Webb, are discredited and demoralized to the point of suicide.)
This is why "President" Bush will not admit to past use of marijuana (and, judging from his remarks on recently released tapes, possibly cocaine and LSD, too.)
This is why we have those neat "This is your brain on drugs" commercials, in which the wacked teenaged girl smashes her kitchen up with a frying pan. Wow. Potent stuff. Convinced me not to have children.
And this is why we are now giving enemy Iraq combatants the illegal drug, methylenedioxymeth- amphetamine, or MDMA. AKA "Ecstasy." The Love Drug. Adam. Hug Beans. High of choice at "raves" for at least fifteen years.
No, no---wait, I've got it wrong. We're not giving it to the enemy, we're giving it to our combatants! Our soldiers. That's right. G.I. Joe and G.I. Jane are on MDMA.
War on Drugs, meet the war on drugs.
"Private, I gave you an order! Did you hear me?"
"You have a beautifu soul, sir."
"Pick up your weapon!"
"But the enemy is human, sir. If we could just sit down together and talk for a while. . ."
And you thought it was crazy that the military recently considered devising a drug to turn enemy combatants into instant homosexuals. You know, so they would immediately put down their guns and pick up their, well, you get the idea.
This is your country. This is your country on drugs.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says that Ecstasy could help traumatized soldiers deal with "flashbacks" and recurring nightmares---and maybe even head off post-traumatic stress disorder. So a clinical "trial" program is under way, in which military victims of rape, sexual abuse and post-traumatic stress have been given MDMA.
Michael Mithoefer, a shrink in charge of the clinical trial, recently made a lot of clinical statements to the press, such as how it all looks "very promising," and "it's too early to draw any conclusions, but in these treatment-resistant people so far the results are encouraging," and "people are able to connect more deeply on an emotional level with the fact they are safe now."
Wink, wink.
Help with nightmares? Ease post-traumatic stress disorder? Make you "connect more deeply on an emotional level?" Is he kidding? You fall in love with the goddamn kitchen table. Kirstie Alley looks like three hundred pounds of heavenly joy. And er, "safe?" Well, Herr Mithoefer is right about that. There is only one thing imaginable that could induce a feeling of safety right in the middle of the Iraq war, and it ain't a visit from Donald Rumsfeld. . .
________________________________________
Can't you see it? Men with assault rifles and big fake nipples in their mouths. . .
_________________________________________
Ecstasy is paradise with an ocean view. Physiologically, it blows open the seratonin floodgates until your brain is swimming, bathing, floating in unimaginable bliss. Malice toward no one. Before you know it, you're picking up ants from the carpet and gently placing them on the front lawn, wishing them a long and prosperous life, muttering "you have souls, too, little fellows. . ."
Ecstasy is Viagra for niceness. Give it to soldiers, and they won't want to kill the enemy, they'll want to kill 'em with kindness.
"It appears to act as a catalyst," says Mithoefer, "to help people move through whatever's been blocking their success in therapy."
Oh, it's a catalyst. It'll catalyze you into really enjoying the Teletubbies, and Mister Rogers and trance music. Ever see Rave People with pacifiers around their necks, or even---gasp---in their mouths? One of the features of Hug Beans is that their methampetamine component gets your jaw grinding, so the pacifier sates that particular compulsion.
Can't you see it? Men with assault rifles and big fake nipples in their mouths, breaking down Iraqi doors to win "hearts and minds." That ought to scare the crap out of Al-Qaeda.
So here's another reason to enlist, kids! Aside from the fact you have no job, a lousy education, and that Marine recruiter at Wal-Mart said you could use a military career as a springboard to becoming a famous rapper.
Drugs!
Go to Iraq, tell a shrink you're a little upset, and you'll get lots of pure pharmaceutical Ecstasy---not that watered down, speedy junk going around the raves. The good stuff. Far out! It's still a felony for us, but it's good fellowship for you. Why not just issue it with K-rations instead of free cigarettes?
Beats shooting heroin, like those poor Vietnam guys did.
Yes, forget all the "just say no" rhetoric and all the claims that ecstasy puts holes in the brain (now discredited)---it's a good drug again. Forget about suspicions that too much MDMA burns out seratonin producers or receptors, and can leave users with long-term depression. Just say yes!
After all, it was legal until the late '80s, when therapists employed it to help patients conquer fear, anxiety, and related disorders. Then the government banned it for the same reason that most things are banned: kids found that it was a lot of fun at parties, then got into automobiles.
I'm for it, risks and all. I'm for giving all our soldiers Ecstasy---and all their soldiers, too. In fact, all the armies of the world should take it, and certainly all the terrorists and politicians.
We'd have no more worries, at least until the drugs wore off.
"Soldier, what is your mission?"
"Mmmph Blurgh pfrkph."
"Take the pacifier out of your mouth, son."
printer-friendly version
E-MAIL: mail@riprense.com
WAR ON DRUGS (copyright 2005 Rip Rense)
Drugs, as we know, are evil. This is why Nancy Reagan told everyone to "just say no." This is why countless millions---er, billions---are spent fighting the "War on Drugs" instead of on, say, schools. (Gee, isn't it funny how drugs are more plentiful and popular than ever, anyhow?)
This is why Tommy Chong was thrown in jail for selling water-pipes.
This is why we have lots of "operatives" in the cocaine republics of South America doing strange things that we rarely hear about (especially when good reporters who write about them, like the late Gary Webb, are discredited and demoralized to the point of suicide.)
This is why "President" Bush will not admit to past use of marijuana (and, judging from his remarks on recently released tapes, possibly cocaine and LSD, too.)
This is why we have those neat "This is your brain on drugs" commercials, in which the wacked teenaged girl smashes her kitchen up with a frying pan. Wow. Potent stuff. Convinced me not to have children.
And this is why we are now giving enemy Iraq combatants the illegal drug, methylenedioxymeth- amphetamine, or MDMA. AKA "Ecstasy." The Love Drug. Adam. Hug Beans. High of choice at "raves" for at least fifteen years.
No, no---wait, I've got it wrong. We're not giving it to the enemy, we're giving it to our combatants! Our soldiers. That's right. G.I. Joe and G.I. Jane are on MDMA.
War on Drugs, meet the war on drugs.
"Private, I gave you an order! Did you hear me?"
"You have a beautifu soul, sir."
"Pick up your weapon!"
"But the enemy is human, sir. If we could just sit down together and talk for a while. . ."
And you thought it was crazy that the military recently considered devising a drug to turn enemy combatants into instant homosexuals. You know, so they would immediately put down their guns and pick up their, well, you get the idea.
This is your country. This is your country on drugs.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says that Ecstasy could help traumatized soldiers deal with "flashbacks" and recurring nightmares---and maybe even head off post-traumatic stress disorder. So a clinical "trial" program is under way, in which military victims of rape, sexual abuse and post-traumatic stress have been given MDMA.
Michael Mithoefer, a shrink in charge of the clinical trial, recently made a lot of clinical statements to the press, such as how it all looks "very promising," and "it's too early to draw any conclusions, but in these treatment-resistant people so far the results are encouraging," and "people are able to connect more deeply on an emotional level with the fact they are safe now."
Wink, wink.
Help with nightmares? Ease post-traumatic stress disorder? Make you "connect more deeply on an emotional level?" Is he kidding? You fall in love with the goddamn kitchen table. Kirstie Alley looks like three hundred pounds of heavenly joy. And er, "safe?" Well, Herr Mithoefer is right about that. There is only one thing imaginable that could induce a feeling of safety right in the middle of the Iraq war, and it ain't a visit from Donald Rumsfeld. . .
________________________________________
Can't you see it? Men with assault rifles and big fake nipples in their mouths. . .
_________________________________________
Ecstasy is paradise with an ocean view. Physiologically, it blows open the seratonin floodgates until your brain is swimming, bathing, floating in unimaginable bliss. Malice toward no one. Before you know it, you're picking up ants from the carpet and gently placing them on the front lawn, wishing them a long and prosperous life, muttering "you have souls, too, little fellows. . ."
Ecstasy is Viagra for niceness. Give it to soldiers, and they won't want to kill the enemy, they'll want to kill 'em with kindness.
"It appears to act as a catalyst," says Mithoefer, "to help people move through whatever's been blocking their success in therapy."
Oh, it's a catalyst. It'll catalyze you into really enjoying the Teletubbies, and Mister Rogers and trance music. Ever see Rave People with pacifiers around their necks, or even---gasp---in their mouths? One of the features of Hug Beans is that their methampetamine component gets your jaw grinding, so the pacifier sates that particular compulsion.
Can't you see it? Men with assault rifles and big fake nipples in their mouths, breaking down Iraqi doors to win "hearts and minds." That ought to scare the crap out of Al-Qaeda.
So here's another reason to enlist, kids! Aside from the fact you have no job, a lousy education, and that Marine recruiter at Wal-Mart said you could use a military career as a springboard to becoming a famous rapper.
Drugs!
Go to Iraq, tell a shrink you're a little upset, and you'll get lots of pure pharmaceutical Ecstasy---not that watered down, speedy junk going around the raves. The good stuff. Far out! It's still a felony for us, but it's good fellowship for you. Why not just issue it with K-rations instead of free cigarettes?
Beats shooting heroin, like those poor Vietnam guys did.
Yes, forget all the "just say no" rhetoric and all the claims that ecstasy puts holes in the brain (now discredited)---it's a good drug again. Forget about suspicions that too much MDMA burns out seratonin producers or receptors, and can leave users with long-term depression. Just say yes!
After all, it was legal until the late '80s, when therapists employed it to help patients conquer fear, anxiety, and related disorders. Then the government banned it for the same reason that most things are banned: kids found that it was a lot of fun at parties, then got into automobiles.
I'm for it, risks and all. I'm for giving all our soldiers Ecstasy---and all their soldiers, too. In fact, all the armies of the world should take it, and certainly all the terrorists and politicians.
We'd have no more worries, at least until the drugs wore off.
"Soldier, what is your mission?"
"Mmmph Blurgh pfrkph."
"Take the pacifier out of your mouth, son."
printer-friendly version
E-MAIL: mail@riprense.com
Thursday, March 03, 2005
Good afternoon. Synchronicity...strange coincidences...random acts of madness. This is life in Los Angeles. If you haven't seen or heard from someone in a long-ass time, you're sure to "run into" that person within a 5-mile radius of Hollywood. I'm not kidding. My fiance's client works for a school that just interviewed my mother's husband. AND, the funny thing about it was that my fiance's client KNEW who he was, and what his relationship was to me the entire time, but she kept it quiet. Ha ha. She had to laugh. He was actually using his wife's father's name on his resume. Can you believe the lowest form of name-dropping there is? My Grandfather, (Jackie Coogan) was deceased before he had even met my mom. He hadn't even met the man who's name he was using as a reference! That's balls. Just goes to show you, the kind of ankle-biting, fleas you pick up in this park. So, in the name of fairness, here's his name.
Rob Tobin, I hope you google this.
-Hollywoodkids
Rob Tobin, I hope you google this.
-Hollywoodkids
Friday, February 25, 2005
Jeff Gannon, Male Presstitute. Flogger. (Fake Blogger) He finally got mention on a mainstream news outlet, but it's not to warn the public about our corrupt administration. The focus on the piece was, "What is a journalist?" Are you kidding me? One thing I know, is that Jeff Gannon was not a journalist. Flat fact. What the fuck is "Talon News?" OK, fine. I have a news outlet called, "A blog". Now may I have a press pass so I can ask MY questions of the President. I didn't think so.
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
Sunday, November 14, 2004
A Yuppie International Banker's Apology to his children in 2008 just before he disappears from public view:
"On behalf of my generation and all others like me, please accept my apology for those acts listed below:
1. Forgive me for allowing my children to play excessive video games and become violence oriented from them. I didn't listen to the researchers back in the 1980's. Back then it was clinically discovered that the affects of violent games had lasting effects but I ignored those findings. The games became worse and more violent after the turn of the millennium but I figured "it would happen to someone else's children."
2. Forgive me for not making my children play outside with other children. Instead, I sheltered them indoors where they were in front of either the television or computer.
3. Forgive me for ignoring the cries, pleads and warnings of true patriots that years ago told me liberties would vanish forever, until a civil war ensued. But today experts don't think a grass roots movement has a chance, because of tracking chip implants.
4. Forgive me for laughing off the crooked elections back in 2004 as an internet hoax - and thinking that because the media was silent about it there wasn't a problem. Was I ever wrong.
5. Forgive me for not voicing opposition towards the Patriot Act, and the follow-up to it some called Patriot 2. It truly was the beginning of the end of freedom in America.
6. Forgive me for not disciplining my children, and giving into the whining liberals that said any form of effective discipline is abuse. Now my son is in trouble with the law because he thinks the world is like a video game, and lashes out at anyone at anytime. Teachers at school now are threatening that if he isn't on a mind-controlling drug, he won't be allowed at school.
7. Forgive me for finally giving in to email porn and letting my children see it. I could have stopped it with the right software, but didn't think it would affect them that much. That is, until my 14 year old daughter tried to pose for a pay-porn website. By then it was too late.
8. Forgive me for firmly thinking that God doesn't exist. Scientists today have finally admitted to it after decoding the remaining DNA. I was dumber than a door-knob and went with the ultra-liberal viewpoints of past years. It was the recent miracle of a drowned 12 year old girl that changed me. She was underwater for an hour, and when she was revived without brain damage. This convinced me God must exist.
9. Forgive me when I thought the economy would perpetually support a ballooning national debt. Now it's crashed and all agree it will not come back as it was. The chip implant has replaced all the cash I carried before. Years ago I knew the right powerful people in world government that could have averted this inventory system for humanity. It was right there within my grasp, but I never grabbed the chance to change things. Now were all just like inventory on a store shelf.
10. Forgive me for believing the Federal Reserve was part of the government. I was just going along with what I was taught in school. Shortly after becoming successful as a international banker, I discovered the truth but still chose to ignore it. It was when I found it was only in the business section of telephone directories, did I begin to think about it and look into it. Now I know America is run by the Bankers, and they pull every string in Washington. As we say in the business world about the golden rule - "He who has the gold, rules."
11. Forgive me for believing the fabricated myth of terrorism. Why did I believe only men that wear bed sheets in civilian life could only be responsible for the numerous terror acts that began in 2001 ? Television and media all stated this as fact, therefore I believed foreign terrorism on American soil was real.
12. Forgive me for pretending to ignore the missing people that began to be public in 2005. Good friends and relatives that vanished during the night. Neighbors whose front doors were wide open in the morning, no one home and their car in the driveway. But I was told it was for the good of America, so I believed it.
13. Forgive me for ignoring the countless deaths, mutilations and birth defects of returning service-people from the mid-east. There were so many that suffered from this. It wasn't on television, so I laughed them off as conspiracy nuts. Now my own grandchild is missing and arm and a leg at birth. And all my millions won't help him be normal again. Already the children are ridiculing him. This was his father's reward for volunteering for Bush's war - to bring the radioactivity and toxins home to harm his wife and unborn children.
14. Forgive me for thinking that chemtrails were not real. Recently a whistle-blower named John was on a live television interview exposing everything about it. He claimed he knew all about it, because he helped mix the chemicals used in the planes. I thought he was another conspiracy nut too, until the next morning it was announced a mysterious explosion happened in his home during the night where he was sleeping. He didn't survive. What got my attention was the Homeland Security vehicles that showed up at the blaze, and prevented ordinary local police from getting near it. Even fireman were not allowed access to put out the blaze. All they could do was to water down nearby buildings to prevent flash-over.
15. Forgive me for refusing to believe we were really under martial law since 2001. Only recently did Bush declare this, and tell the world he kept it secret to protect the world's economy. And all those years, many suspected that since 2001 it was in place ! It explains why all those various acts and bills on capitol hill Bush wanted, he always got. Including Patriot 2, the worst freedom crushing act in US history.
17. Forgive me for thinking that social engineering is a myth. Because of all the things I've listed above, I know its fact.
18. Forgive me for believing everything in history books must be true and factual. And for laughing off historical documents and European history that contradict what I was taught in school.
19. Forgive me for believing that the government could not legally take my hard-earned fortune and assets. They did it anyway. And everything else I owned. All because of a casual remark I made at the office talking about the president and a mentally challenged chimpanzee in the same sentence. But with the crashed economy all of it would have been lost anyway, because now the dollar is obsolete. I'm writing this email to you at the library because they also took my computer. I have to sign off now to go visit a camp for a place to eat and sleep. Some people here are whispering that I can't leave the camp once inside, but this America and that can't happen here."
Ted Twietmeyer
"On behalf of my generation and all others like me, please accept my apology for those acts listed below:
1. Forgive me for allowing my children to play excessive video games and become violence oriented from them. I didn't listen to the researchers back in the 1980's. Back then it was clinically discovered that the affects of violent games had lasting effects but I ignored those findings. The games became worse and more violent after the turn of the millennium but I figured "it would happen to someone else's children."
2. Forgive me for not making my children play outside with other children. Instead, I sheltered them indoors where they were in front of either the television or computer.
3. Forgive me for ignoring the cries, pleads and warnings of true patriots that years ago told me liberties would vanish forever, until a civil war ensued. But today experts don't think a grass roots movement has a chance, because of tracking chip implants.
4. Forgive me for laughing off the crooked elections back in 2004 as an internet hoax - and thinking that because the media was silent about it there wasn't a problem. Was I ever wrong.
5. Forgive me for not voicing opposition towards the Patriot Act, and the follow-up to it some called Patriot 2. It truly was the beginning of the end of freedom in America.
6. Forgive me for not disciplining my children, and giving into the whining liberals that said any form of effective discipline is abuse. Now my son is in trouble with the law because he thinks the world is like a video game, and lashes out at anyone at anytime. Teachers at school now are threatening that if he isn't on a mind-controlling drug, he won't be allowed at school.
7. Forgive me for finally giving in to email porn and letting my children see it. I could have stopped it with the right software, but didn't think it would affect them that much. That is, until my 14 year old daughter tried to pose for a pay-porn website. By then it was too late.
8. Forgive me for firmly thinking that God doesn't exist. Scientists today have finally admitted to it after decoding the remaining DNA. I was dumber than a door-knob and went with the ultra-liberal viewpoints of past years. It was the recent miracle of a drowned 12 year old girl that changed me. She was underwater for an hour, and when she was revived without brain damage. This convinced me God must exist.
9. Forgive me when I thought the economy would perpetually support a ballooning national debt. Now it's crashed and all agree it will not come back as it was. The chip implant has replaced all the cash I carried before. Years ago I knew the right powerful people in world government that could have averted this inventory system for humanity. It was right there within my grasp, but I never grabbed the chance to change things. Now were all just like inventory on a store shelf.
10. Forgive me for believing the Federal Reserve was part of the government. I was just going along with what I was taught in school. Shortly after becoming successful as a international banker, I discovered the truth but still chose to ignore it. It was when I found it was only in the business section of telephone directories, did I begin to think about it and look into it. Now I know America is run by the Bankers, and they pull every string in Washington. As we say in the business world about the golden rule - "He who has the gold, rules."
11. Forgive me for believing the fabricated myth of terrorism. Why did I believe only men that wear bed sheets in civilian life could only be responsible for the numerous terror acts that began in 2001 ? Television and media all stated this as fact, therefore I believed foreign terrorism on American soil was real.
12. Forgive me for pretending to ignore the missing people that began to be public in 2005. Good friends and relatives that vanished during the night. Neighbors whose front doors were wide open in the morning, no one home and their car in the driveway. But I was told it was for the good of America, so I believed it.
13. Forgive me for ignoring the countless deaths, mutilations and birth defects of returning service-people from the mid-east. There were so many that suffered from this. It wasn't on television, so I laughed them off as conspiracy nuts. Now my own grandchild is missing and arm and a leg at birth. And all my millions won't help him be normal again. Already the children are ridiculing him. This was his father's reward for volunteering for Bush's war - to bring the radioactivity and toxins home to harm his wife and unborn children.
14. Forgive me for thinking that chemtrails were not real. Recently a whistle-blower named John was on a live television interview exposing everything about it. He claimed he knew all about it, because he helped mix the chemicals used in the planes. I thought he was another conspiracy nut too, until the next morning it was announced a mysterious explosion happened in his home during the night where he was sleeping. He didn't survive. What got my attention was the Homeland Security vehicles that showed up at the blaze, and prevented ordinary local police from getting near it. Even fireman were not allowed access to put out the blaze. All they could do was to water down nearby buildings to prevent flash-over.
15. Forgive me for refusing to believe we were really under martial law since 2001. Only recently did Bush declare this, and tell the world he kept it secret to protect the world's economy. And all those years, many suspected that since 2001 it was in place ! It explains why all those various acts and bills on capitol hill Bush wanted, he always got. Including Patriot 2, the worst freedom crushing act in US history.
17. Forgive me for thinking that social engineering is a myth. Because of all the things I've listed above, I know its fact.
18. Forgive me for believing everything in history books must be true and factual. And for laughing off historical documents and European history that contradict what I was taught in school.
19. Forgive me for believing that the government could not legally take my hard-earned fortune and assets. They did it anyway. And everything else I owned. All because of a casual remark I made at the office talking about the president and a mentally challenged chimpanzee in the same sentence. But with the crashed economy all of it would have been lost anyway, because now the dollar is obsolete. I'm writing this email to you at the library because they also took my computer. I have to sign off now to go visit a camp for a place to eat and sleep. Some people here are whispering that I can't leave the camp once inside, but this America and that can't happen here."
Ted Twietmeyer
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)